http://mwk6o6rxcc5w5tzvl3coudgrqqiudswyuu4hbc7idufgis2echll5cqd.onion
(March 22, 2011) (holding that " filing " a complaint included complaints made orally). [7] a mere
depiction of a child in their underwear without more clearly does not
involve sexual intercourse of any kind, beastiality, masturbation, or
sadistic or masochistic abuse, such that any argument to that effect
is non sequitur for the purposes of the narrow topic of conversation
presented here. [8] The statute does
not define “ exhibition ” , and “ exhibition ” likewise is not a term of art.